Healthy

Startup airlines push for boost in foreign ownership limits to ensure more competition

The Canadian aviation industry is littered with failed startups, and allowing more foreign risk capital into the market could mean the difference between launching and not launching for Jetlines, CEO Jim Scott said.

Two of Canada’s aspiring no-frills carriers say an offer to provide foreign investors a larger stake within the country’s airlines could mean the main difference between their success and failure.

How three Canadian airline startups intend to take flight in a daunting market

Ben Nelms for National Post

For a trio of Canadian airline upstarts whose launch date is imminent, the best way to avoid participating in a cost war, it seems, is finding a niche and sticking with it.

Continue reading.

A sweeping review of the Canada Transportation Act, tabled in Parliament recently, included a recommendation that Ottawa increase foreign ownership limits for commercial airlines to 49 per cent.

The current limit of 25 per cent acts as a “barrier to entry” for new airlines, said David Emerson, the former cabinet minister who authored the report.

“There is room to improve competitiveness, as evidenced through the high load factors and the record profits of these two largest carriers, as well as the proven fact that Canada may be the only major air market without an ultra-low-cost carrier,” Emerson wrote.

“In contrast to larger markets like the U.S., there might not be enough capital in Canada to invest in 75 per cent of a new national carrier.”

This is a wall that executives have run up against at Canada Jetlines Ltd., a fledgling ultra-low-cost carrier that has yet to obtain off the floor, according to CEO Jim Scott.

“Canada isn’t known for having lots of risk capital,” Scott said within an interview.

“We notice that when we go into the Usa and talk to institutions, they’re more concerned about the potential upside, whereas the Canadian institutions tend to worry about how you are going to mitigate risk.”

The Canadian aviation industry is full of failed startups, and allowing more foreign risk capital in to the market can often mean the difference between launching and not launching for Jetlines, Scott said.

“We believe that in order to launch an ultra-low-cost carrier in Canada it takes risk capital, and there is risk capital both in the United States and Europe that is around the sidelines at this time because they do not like the current ownership (model),” he said.

“Forty-nine per cent will be a lot more palatable for them and we feel it might increase our chances of getting funding.”

At Enerjet, a Calgary-based charter airline that’s evaluating the potential of launching its own no-frills carrier, the feeling would be that the proposal is really a part of the best direction but could go even further. (Enerjet has renamed its potential low-cost airline FlyToo, ditching the previous moniker of Jet Naked.)

Related

To Top