Healthy

Peter Tertzakian: The future of the oil and gas business depends on who can adapt and innovate fastest

The end is nigh for many high cost, high carbon energy producers that are too slow to react to the fast-paced changes from the outside.

“Exciting!” is not a word that many would use to describe the oil and gas business these days. Not with low commodity prices. And not using the assault on non-renewable fuels by energy systems run by renewables.

But it’s true: amidst the depressing news of layoffs and spending cuts, “exciting” was the word I heard several times in a small breakfast reunion a week ago. Five executive MBA students which i had taught a couple of years ago were excited about the prospects of reinventing their businesses. Their initiatives are driving highly innovative processes which are shaping the brand new realm of oil and gas C a landscape currently characterized by the blunt force trauma of lower prices, rising social standards, and cutthroat competition of all the quarter.

My former students’ enthusiasm for jousting with disruptive business forces helped me think of the pointed wit of GE’s former CEO, Jack Welch, who once said, “If the rate of change on the outside exceeds the rate of change on the inside, the end is near.”

To make sure, I meet people who are not as excitable as my former students. For a lot of of these Welch’s adage is a prognosis. In other words, the end is nigh for many high cost, high carbon energy producers which are too slow to respond to the fast-paced changes externally, be it from Texas, Saudi Arabia or Silicon Valley.

But my students were taught well and I believe “the end” is a long distance off on their behalf. They’ve brought out the proverbial white piece of paper and therefore are picking out remarkable innovations to lower cost and carbon. And I routinely meet other leaders who are embracing changes in their organizations as quickly, or faster compared to changes on the outside. They too will survive, otherwise thrive. That’s because innovation is not something that’s exclusive to outsiders. History implies that insider incumbents can change and adapt quickly too, defending and extending their market share when under threat.

I thought more about Welch’s rate-of-change statement, which has an Einstein-relativity feel into it. In other words, innovation between fierce competitors is relative. Who will innovate faster? Oil companies (the insiders)? Or the ones that wish to displace them (the outsiders)?

Related

To Top