Economists are still hotly debating if the oil crash is a net positive for advanced economies.
‘I’m done’: Alberta’s laid-off oil workers instructed to abandon industry in worst downturn they’ve ever seen
Alberta lost 19,600 jobs this past year – the most since 1982 and lots of industry veterans are deciding they are able to no more take the boom and bust roller-coaster. Read on
Optimists argue that cheap oil is a good thing for consumers and commodity-sensitive businesses, while pessimists indicate the hit to energy-related investment and possible spillover into the economic climate.
A new note from Francisco Blanch at Bank of the usa Merrill Lynch, however, puts the oil move right into a much bigger perspective, arguing that the sustained price plunge “will push back $3 trillion annually from oil producers to global consumers, setting happens for one from the largest transfers of wealth in human history.”
Blanch and the team already see evidence that the fall in the price of crude has an optimistic impact on demand, and say that it could accelerate even more if prices don’t pick up.
Says Blanch: “Alternatively in a lower oil price scenario, e.g. if prices were to average just US$40 within the next five years which is close to the current forward curve, demand would grow by 1.5 million barrels each day, which is 0.3 above our base case. Finally, at $20 oil demand would grow by an explosive by 1.7 per year typically, 0.5 over the base case, on our estimates.”